1
Members Machines / Re: BF20 Mill conversion
« on: February 14, 2025, 13:42:06 pm »
When doing the design trades on my next machine, the sheer mass of N34s was a bit eye watering.
I could easily incorporate an air spring, but but the router is fairly light compared to a larger spindle and......
Yes, and the MR is R&P drive with two motors on the gantry. I modified/increased the Z-Axis stroke on the MR. It was a an easy mod. Doing so decreased the urgency for completing my next machine. The reason: all the things that make the hobby grade MR less attractive for more challenging duty actually make it pretty good for cutting foam.....it's very low mass makes for low inertial loads and it's quite fast, and since cutting forces are essentially nil for foam, I pay no penalty for the lower rigidity.
On the other hand, the alternate machine with steel beams and superior motion control components, though much more rigid, is also much more massive, especially with N34s. I'm considering reducing the work envelope and having it dedicated to harder up to soft metals....like machining my castings....
It's the old chestnut....-Jack of all trades master of none.
The problem is the availability of shop space for both machines or it would be done.
Best,
Kelly
No not really in this case, it's just the gravity thing, If I had an air spring or counterbalance system then the Nema 24's would be fine for the Z axis
I could easily incorporate an air spring, but but the router is fairly light compared to a larger spindle and......
If the motors are on the machine frame, the mass of the motors is not so important. I think that with your use case, fast light cuts with not a of cutting forces the Nema 24's would be ok for the Z, on the millright they would be overkill, every kilogram you strip from the Z axis lets you up the acceleration rates.
Yes, and the MR is R&P drive with two motors on the gantry. I modified/increased the Z-Axis stroke on the MR. It was a an easy mod. Doing so decreased the urgency for completing my next machine. The reason: all the things that make the hobby grade MR less attractive for more challenging duty actually make it pretty good for cutting foam.....it's very low mass makes for low inertial loads and it's quite fast, and since cutting forces are essentially nil for foam, I pay no penalty for the lower rigidity.
On the other hand, the alternate machine with steel beams and superior motion control components, though much more rigid, is also much more massive, especially with N34s. I'm considering reducing the work envelope and having it dedicated to harder up to soft metals....like machining my castings....

It's the old chestnut....-Jack of all trades master of none.
The problem is the availability of shop space for both machines or it would be done.
Best,
Kelly