Just to be clear, the quoted feedrates (4.5 m/min) was not about what you should set the the rapids to, it was in answer to this question asked earlier in the thread post 11.
Understood. Also, the available ball screw leads were 4 or 5 (not 4.5) or 10. 5 & 10 have interchangeable interface dimensions.
If your router + backing plate + (carriages or rail) depending on where you have mountedthem is less than 8 Kg then a Nema 23 3 N/m will be fine, if it%u2019s 10Kg then a 4 N/m motor would suffice. If the weight is greater than this then you would have to drop the feedrates and acceleration.
The
moving mass on the Z will be <<10kg, probably <10lbs and comparable to that of the existing machine hardware. Compared to the existing machine, the stroke increases from 3.75" to 8"+, the router power doubles, the centerline distance from spindle to beam centerline is slightly less, and the rigidity for the first 4" of stroke should be greatly improved. The only time the machine would ever see the upper regions of the stroke where rigidity could be more of an issue is for cutting foam, so it shouldn't be challenged. I was happy to be able to achieve all that. The height of the entire cutting surface can be repositioned or use of a platform will be used to control the height under gantry and accommodate different active travel cutting rates, but I don't expect to need to change this often as 4" under gantry with 2" cut height covers the vast majority of how the machine is used.
The X&Y axis will remain R&P drive for now. The moving mass on the Y axis will increase more significantly but it has two N23 steppers driving it.
Something to note is that for a Z axis where the travel stroke is short, setting the velocity is not the secret to getting a good performance, it's the acceleration.
I guess in my mind, I was thinking for a given motor torque a 5mm/rev ball screw would have at least 5x the mechanical advantage in linear force as an acme screw that had 5x that lead/rev. I just didn't know how much of the Z-accel was dictated by this and the traveling Z mass versus the stepper motor's internal inertial mass, stepper driver, and controller. Sounds like we're going to find out. I think you'll like it.
I'm not optimistic about being able to access the command lines on the proprietary MillRight control board but that is yet to be confirmed. That could expand this project a bit. Hoping to build hardware over the holidays and have plan of action on this before I pull the existing hardware apart.
Just for my learning, when feed rate is set in a CB MOP, that is just for X&Y axis, and the Z is a calculated/along-for-the-ride as determined by the tool path, correct? Hard to say what Z accelerations will be reuired since it's so dependent on feedrate and profile shape, but if Z cant keep up, it'll just require backing off feed rate, but it's hasnt been a problem to date on my high(er) feedrate foam pattern cutting.
Best,
Kelly