I'm not sure I understand why this is the case?
10.1.2 Rotational Axes The rotational axes are measured in degrees as wrapped linear axes in which the direction
of positive rotation is counterclockwise when viewed from the positive end of the corresponding X, Y, or Z-axis.
By "wrapped linear axis," we mean one on which the angular position increases without limit (goes towards plus infinity) as the axis turns
counterclockwise and decreases without limit (goes towards minus infinity) as the axis turns clockwise. Wrapped linear axes are used
regardless of whether or not there is a mechanical limit on rotation.
So in short :
rollover on DRO reads 358,359,360,0,1,2
rollover off DRO reads 358,359,360,361,362
Thanks David I'll keep that in mind, I took some of my conceptional inspiration from in part the lathe G32.
I have used fusion for the lathe (nice) and now use Ezilathe, sometimes I do the drawing in CB and export a .dxf.
For the most part I use my lathe like this:
Sometimes I just want to clean up a shaft with emery tape so I don't even turn the controller on.
For mostly simple to medium complexity jobs I use the Mach3 built in wizards. This is most of the time.
For threading I use Ezilate (I would not use anything else).
For complex\tricky jobs still use the same procedure but turn the AI in the turrets on.
Standing back and looking at the big picture, the plugin lets everyone from those with a small al based machine
running grbl to a modern industrial controller because the Gcode is simple Gcode commands and not macros
which have
incompatibilities in their implementation across controllers.
The other thing is that you get to make a drilling cycle which is identical to say a standard G83
and then customise it to suit the exact needs of a particular task at hand.
I read in a paper somewhere that 90% of the wear on a drill is when it starts to cut so pecking
would shorten the life of the drill but there's cases where clearly because of the nature of the material, you have too, the other day
I started using pauses instead of pecks 'to break the chips really, rather than it being a deep hole or gummy material, so that the
swarf would not curl up around the spindle, this worked well as I could set the length of the swarf (about 50mm) so it was very easy
to clean up later and I had a clear view of the cut during cutting so that I could give it a spritz of cutting fluid.
Would this be better than pecking where you can set the length of the swarf also, I don't know
I guess not, but my machine has really fast rapids so bangs about while pecking where with pausing
I could not hear anything other than the spindle and the swarf length was programmable too.
It was a much more pleasant experience stood next to the mill.
Just as an aside I got my son to hold the motor end of the unit and I grabbed the business end with a rag just to get a
human sense of how much torque was available and it's going to be more than adequate when I did the calc's I rounded
down and used conservative numbers.
The optimistic numbers made it a little under 5 N\m so I went a got a new harder spider for the jaw coupling.
Dave